Print Journalism: Meet the New Boss. Same as the Old Boss?

March 4th, 2010 by BillBaker

BusinessWeek

I received the latest copy of BusinessWeek in the mail today. (Yes, I continue to cling to print like grim death.)

When I first pulled it out of the mailbox, I thought “Wow! That’s quite the cover story for Avaya.” About a second later, I realized it was a “cover wrap” advertisement. (You can click on the image to open in a new window, then click again, to see how BusinessWeek covers itself, circled by me in green.)

These types of ads are not new. They have been around for years on trade publications. But this one was a bit startling in how misleading it was, if only for a second. I guess that’s the point.

Bloomberg bought BusinessWeek from McGraw-Hill a few months ago. I am glad that it is still in print. But is this what it takes for print to survive in these troubled times for traditional media?

Maybe I am just old fashioned, to wit:

A.) Get over it. This type of advertising is no biggie.

or

B.) Get over it. Print is dead.

Do we need to get over the old ways of journalism? What do you think?

Health Care in the U.S. is Neither Healthy Nor Caring

February 19th, 2010 by Joe Eckert

CBSNews.com

Read about my experience with our broken health care system over on CBSNews.com

How Reading Habits Have Changed

January 28th, 2010 by Glenn Rossman

Online News

What happened to those days of spending time opening the newspaper to read? Or, those Fridays when the print edition of Business Week magazine arrived and that meant spending time soon thereafter going through the current issue?

I was reminiscing over those days with my colleague, Joe Eckert (much, much older than me), which got us talking about how our business reading habits have changed.

First, something called the Internet happened, which was soon followed by Yahoo and Google search (in that order, I believe), then RSS feeds and most recently, Twitter. Now, business reading is a “search and destroy” mission based on keywords

I still get a bunch of print magazines like Business Week and Fortune because they cost next-to-nothing. (I guess so the publishers can maintain a subscriber list to show advertisers.)

And, I get electronic weekly editions of trade publications like eWeek and Network World that look just like the print versions but conveniently get delivered to my computer. I confess it’s hit or miss whether I read through those or not.

But, I am zealous about keeping up with reading all the material fetched by search terms and keywords I have set up in a bunch of places.

It works for me keeping up with the news I need, but I miss perusing the daily newspaper along with the business and trade magazines — and the accidental discoveries along the way that I couldn’t resist reading.

How about you?

When PR?

January 7th, 2010 by Joe Eckert

This post originally appeared on Sean Ellis’s “Startup Marketing Blog”.

————-

Because we specialize in communications for high tech start-ups, we’re often asked “when should I start a PR program?”

It’s a simple question. The simple answer (often given) is: “No time like the present.”

The real answer is bit more complex. We always ask prospective clients about their strategic company goals, as well as near- and long-term product plans so that we can help the management team determine whether a PR program can be helpful – and sustainable.

Once all parties agree that the time is, in fact, “now”, we go about the work of creating and executing the strategies and tactics that will help support the corporate vision. One of the first things we look at is helping a client generate a fairly steady stream of “content”.

Content is King

A good PR firm will help guide you and “tease out” the information that will help communicate your value and credibility to customers and partners. Part of your commitment to the PR process is to make sure the company is ready to handle the increased attention that comes with an effective and successful PR program. PR places additional demands on executives and managers who are designated as spokespeople or who otherwise have a stake in the PR process.

Content can begin – and often should begin – with company/product strategy communicated in the form of industry analyst discussions. This foundation work often precedes a more “public” PR campaign, It can also be combined with social media activity and/or “wire press releases” – two examples of content distribution tools. Knowing who is watching you and who you should be watching can often dictate the type, style and frequency of the content. But the key is that a lot of PR deliverables are no longer just media stories. They ARE company-created content that adds value and context to the more traditional media channels.

The Good (Bad?) Old Days

Not so long ago, PR lived in a relatively simple world of communication to the traditional press, who then processed, fact-checked and distilled that information before sending it out to the world. Today’s PR landscape is quite a bit more complex.

Before embarking 10 years ago into the land of the start-up, I and most of our team here spent time at large companies (IBM, Compaq, HP) where the simple rule was don’t communicate unless you get coverage in the press. Today, we’re seeing a disaggregation of traditional media “centers”, however, and now direct forms of communication are supplementing (not supplanting) the role of media. Take blogs, for example. They have become a significant supplement to traditional media and, in fact, many reporters also do double duty as bloggers. And, of course, companies and organizations have their own blogs, which add to the content volume. The influence of Twitter is well documented (ironically, in the traditional media).  Even CUSTOMERS are publicly influencing the buying decisions of other customers. So, today, the press release, the company blog, the analyst deck all take on significance in addition to, and beyond the role of media in delivering content.

While scary (for some), companies must be willing to communicate with their customers and potential customers in an almost 1:1 fashion, or at least to appear that way. You might be thinking “that’s marketing.” And, in a way, it is, but it’s marketing using the tools, language and credibility of public relations/media. And, of course, it’s also using the traditional PR tools FOR press articles and analyst reports.

PR is not a magic bullet. Just as with building a sales and marketing organization – indeed an entire company – an effective PR program builds up over time with activities strategically dictated by what stage the company is at and where it wants to go.

So, when PR?

Ask a simple question…

“The Future of Computing” or “The End of the Desktop as We Know It (Amen)”

December 10th, 2009 by Glenn Rossman

jetsons

Okay, I’m drinking the client Kool Aid here admittedly. But, I can add and 1+1 and that still = 2.

#1 – Not a lot of computing seems to go on at the endpoint (PC, notebook, even smartphone). Everything we do seems tied to something that is on a network or the Internet. (Think about it, how useful is your computer or phone without a connection?)

Next #1 – It’s wicked complicated to upgrade your endpoint with all the data, specific settings, configurations, passwords, applications, downloads, music, etc. I will bet you it takes a day, at least.

And so, that equals 2, which is there has to be a better way.

The better way emerging is a form of desktop virtualization. Take a look at some examples from beta users cited on the Wanova blog.

And, have a look at this Forbes article, “The Death of the PC”.

Both point to the better way ahead, which amounts to the same computing experience for the user without all the hassles and baggage that come with the user maintaining their endpoint – and dealing with it when something goes wrong.

Wanova beta users report big problems are fixed in minutes as opposed to days that it took before. I’ll take that!

The Twitter Wire Service

December 7th, 2009 by Glenn Rossman

wires

I read Jeremy Porter’s “Journalistics” provocative blog post, Is Twitter the New Wire Service? and considered the role and impact of citizen journalist bloggers who self publish.

Things are changing fast in the media and PR.

There is a new model we all have to get used to. No more filters for readers – direct from the source and no requirement for professional standards. (Who needs to be bothered with the nuances of accuracy and objectivity anyway?)

Let’s have a quick look at the good and bad of all this.

The bad – Information comes unfiltered from the source. How much you can trust what is written and their motivations remain suspect … and up to the reader to sort out.

The good – Information comes in real-time. For example, I monitor what people attending industry conferences are tweeting. No waiting for news reports – straight scoop, unfiltered from the attendees.

Consider that the role of citizen journalists who self publish is increasing – more bloggers and Twitterati than ever before – alongside the demise of mainstream media.

Now, consider the impact of these citizen journalist self publishers. I think that is in direct correlation with their audience. Any self-publishing, citizen journalist blogger can become an important voice and maybe substitute for what we know of today as mainstream media. And, that’s sort of okay.

It brings new challenges for PR to find the most impactful outlets, wherever they may be. I know a few.

Goin’ Rogue, IT-style

November 18th, 2009 by Glenn Rossman

Rogue computer guy

I read Nick Wingfield’s Wall Street Journal article, “It’s a Free Country… …So why can’t I pick the technology I use in the office?”

The underlying premise is that there was a time when technology in the office was ahead of technology in the home. This article makes it abundantly clear that those days are behind us. The implications of that role reversal are huge.

Let’s face it, rogue use of technology in the office never has been, and never will be, controlled. And that has huge implications.

It got me thinking that our clients reflect this changes – and are exploiting it. No wonder they’re successful. I long ago gave up thinking it was our help.

Final thought: What technology would Sarah Palin use, bein’ all rogue-ish and all?

Perhaps some (or all) of these:

Likewise (www.likewise.com) cleverly provides software that helps Macs, Linux and Unix systems to connect into networks using Microsoft Active Directory (intended for Windows), which is used everywhere. Lots of big, recognizable name companies are using Likewise software to permit secure access to the corporate network with those rogue computers.

LogMeIn (www.logmein.com) fits the tamest of rogue users in the world. It’s software that lets you get to another computer – like the one at home – from another computer connected on the Internet – like the one at work. No software needs to be loaded onto the computer doing the accessing, which in this case is the one at work, and you have complete control over the home computer. Magic, yes … I use it all the time.

Open-Xchange (www.open-xchange.com) offers an alternative to Microsoft Exchange e-mail and groupware that can be accessed by the user from a web browser, Outlook, Apple iMail, Blackberry, iPhone, just about any other smartphone, and Mozilla Thunderbird (soon-to-be-announced, you heard it hear first). Another innovation from Open-Xchange is the ability to import contact information from social networks like Facebook and LinkedIn so those aren’t isolated islands any longer.

Wanova (www.wanova.com) is introducing a new virtualization software technology that realizes the realities of the rogue enterprise users and enables “customization” by the user, while preserving the benefits of centralized IT management and support when they get into trouble. (Yeah, it’s been known to happen.)

BTW – whether you are presidential candidate or not, you can try most all of these fine software products for free!

Free(dom's) Just Another Word…

November 10th, 2009 by Bill Baker

Free price tag

Remember when we used to pay for stuff?

• AOL was $25.00 a month for 14.4kbps service;

• Mobile phones cost $1,000, were the size of shoe boxes and calls cost a dollar a minute;

• Regular phone service was $50 a month;

• Computer software was a small fortune;

• Newspapers were $1.00 a copy and people, you know, BOUGHT them.

Now, it’s all free. Nobody pays for any of this stuff any more (or pays practically nothing for it.)

And Google seems to be behind a lot of it. From phone calls, to applications to video, Google is giving all of this away for free.

Today, Google announced it was giving away free WiFi for the holidays. Yet through it all, the company seems to be printing money, even in the midst of a recession.

I guess this is all good for us consumers. But taken to the Nth degree, where do we end up?

Nobody pays anything to anyone – except Google.

Want a hamburger? Stop at McGoogle’s for a free meal while you watch banner ads on your table/display unit.

Need a new car? No prob. The new Google Malibu is free for the taking, but you have to listen to a non-stop stream of ads while you drive.

Growing family? Time for that new Google house, totally free, with walls made out of LCD displays so you can watch text ads 24/7.

I know – a discussion about Google’s ubiquity and dominance is so 2008. We had the same discussion about IBM in the ’70s and Microsoft in the 90s.

We are all keenly aware that some snot-nosed dweeb is right now inventing the thing that will topple Google in a few months. Let’s just hope it’s not a Steve Jobs-spawn, who will no doubt swing the other way and charge us a premium for the “designer” Internet.

The Vanishing News Media

October 8th, 2009 by Glenn Rossman

Magic

Shrinking ad dollars have led to shrinking media, wherever you look -  newspapers, consumer and industry trade magazines (like those in IT).

Sadly, that has meant fewer writers. We’ve seen a steady stream of friends working in media – and a ton of talent – jettisoned by their employers.

Filling the void (in volume, maybe not so much in quality), there is blossoming a ton of online media and blogs (ironically, maybe even this one).

I just read an excellent Los Angeles Times article, “A new spin on inside stories,”on this topic. It gets to the heart of the issue, which is whether or not readers can trust what they read anymore.

The disappearance of reputable media outlets and hard-working writers who put out a high quality product comes at a price. There is still plenty to read but who is it from, what is their agenda, and who is paying them to write this stuff are all very legitimate issues.

This isn’t easy to cut through for anyone. We miss those media outlets that don’t exist anymore – and even more the talented writers who took time to understand, analyze, obtain perspective from other experts and report – whether national news, business news or technology news.

It’s that expert synthesis of news and analysis from veteran writers that is missed most, I think. Well, that and of course, delivery from media who had built reputable brands.

As I said in an earlier post, “The Times They Are a Changin’”. Now, it’s up to all of us as readers to decide which of these new outlets (online media, blogs) “deserves to sink, or remain in the swim” as the Los Angeles Times said so perfectly.

Bloggers Disclosing Payment: What Does that Mean?

October 6th, 2009 by Bill Baker

Money bag

The FTC’s ruling that bloggers have to disclose if they were paid or given free product in any reviews is a good idea – in principle.

However, in the technology (and many other) industries, it is common practice to send a reviewer a copy of your company’s software or latest gadget.  So, if I offer a review copy of one of my client’s software products to Timmy the Blogger, is he obligated to disclose that we gave him that copy for review? It would seem so.

There is never any quid pro quo (at least not in my 15+ years of PR) that says “If I give this to you, you will only say good things about it.”

In fact, I am sure that past clients would have loved that, given the less-than-ready-for-prime-time nature of some of the products we submitted for review. (This, of course, does not apply to any current or recent clients…)

It will be interesting to see how this all plays out. For the tech industry, it may not amount to much of anything. It will probably mean that we will see positive and negative reviews of technology products, and all of them will have a generic disclaimer that says “The company that makes this [software, MP3 player, camera, whatever] gave it to me to review.” People will end up ignoring these disclaimers, just like they ignore other warnings, such as “Don’t stand on the top step of the ladder” or “Stop texting your boyfriend while driving 80 mph through a school zone.”

Life goes on.